The notion of adding Donald Trump’s likeness to Mount Rushmore has resurfaced, sparking both curiosity and controversy. Imagine seeing his face carved into the iconic South Dakota mountainside alongside George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln. While it might sound far-fetched, this idea has been floated before, and some are pushing for it again. But is this a serious proposal or just another political talking point?
This concept isn’t entirely new. During Trump’s presidency, the idea was occasionally mentioned, even by Trump himself in jest. In 2020, he humorously remarked that while reports of such a plan were “fake news,” it sounded like a good idea to him. Fast forward to today, and Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna has reignited the conversation by introducing a bill in Congress. She argues that Trump’s achievements, from economic policies to judicial appointments, warrant this prestigious honor. With Republicans like Doug Burgum, the Secretary of the Interior, potentially supporting the move, the discussion has gained traction among Trump loyalists.
I’ve officially introduced legislation to put President Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.
His remarkable accomplishments for our country and the success he will continue to deliver deserve the highest recognition and honor on this iconic national monument. Let’s get carving! pic.twitter.com/vfFuebuS7F
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) January 28, 2025
However, adding a fifth face to Mount Rushmore is no simple task. The monument, completed in 1941, was designed to celebrate four pivotal figures in American history. Any changes would require congressional approval and face significant hurdles. Experts note that there isn’t enough stable rock left on the mountain for additional carvings, making the project logistically challenging. Moreover, given Trump’s polarizing legacy, the proposal would likely spark fierce public debate and resistance.
Supporters argue that Trump’s presidency was transformative enough to earn him a spot. They highlight his economic policies, foreign relations, and efforts to reshape the judiciary as evidence of his greatness. Critics, however, counter that his tenure was marred by controversies, including two impeachments and the January 6th Capitol riot. Many historians also believe altering Mount Rushmore would undermine its historical significance, regardless of who is being considered.
While the idea may serve as a rallying cry for Trump’s base, it remains more symbolic than actionable. Without concrete legislative progress, it’s unlikely to happen anytime soon. Still, the mere suggestion keeps Trump at the center of political discourse, proving once again his ability to dominate headlines. Whether you support or oppose the idea, one thing is clear: Mount Rushmore represents history, and changing it is no small feat.
