The courtroom was tense as Karmelo Anthony, the 17-year-old accused of fatally stabbing another student at a high school track meet, walked out of custody on Monday. His bond had just been reduced from 1millionto250,000—a decision that left many divided.
Judge Angela Tucker’s ruling came with strict conditions: house arrest, an ankle monitor, no contact with the victim’s family, and a ban on social media. But as Anthony exited the Collin County Detention Facility, one reporter’s question cut through the noise: “Why were you armed at school?”
He didn’t answer.
The case has gripped the nation, stirring debates over self-defense, juvenile justice, and school safety. On one side, Austin Metcalf’s family mourns a son they describe as a bright, ambitious student with dreams of playing college football. On the other, Anthony’s supporters argue he acted in fear for his life.
According to witnesses, the altercation began when Anthony was asked to leave a tent during a weather delay. Austin allegedly grabbed him, prompting Anthony to pull a knife. One stab to the chest proved fatal.
Austin’s twin brother, Hunter, held him as he died. Their father, Jeff Metcalf, called it “the most unnatural thing a parent can experience.” Meanwhile, Anthony’s father testified about his son’s clean record, honor-student status, and part-time jobs, pleading financial strain under the original bond.
Online, reactions are split. Some defend Anthony’s right to due process, while others demand accountability. Frisco ISD faces scrutiny for past incidents involving Anthony that were handled internally.
As the case heads to a grand jury, one thing is clear: No ruling can undo the loss on either side.
